SMACC

Simon Carley has us asking ourselves some confronting questions about our abilities in his SMACC Chicago talk ‘Are You as Good as You Think?’. Carley has us delve into our confidence, competencies and whats makes for a good self learning environment.

Initially Carley asks how good we think we are at driving? He then sites studies of Australian and European driver responses stating that 93% of Aussies and 69% europeans rate themselves as above average drivers. In using the example Carley suggests as individuals we are not particularly good at rating ourselves, while inexperienced people tend to rate themselves more highly then experienced people,  calling this illusory superiority cognitive bias.

Carley asked the question since you can’t have awesome without average, how do we measure ourselves?. He then talks us through the following tools and processes to establish better self learning and teaching processes;

Reflection Diaries - revisit it (clinically and physically), follow up.
Peer reviews: 1:1 feedback doesn’t work. It needs to planned with clear goals and objectives such as;
Clarify expectations
review logistics
focus lens
plan feedback
observe event (i.e teaching)
debrief and action
Clinical Feedback
Follow up - not just the exceptionally sick patients, but follow up with the routine ones.
Build Peer Reviews into your practice.

Carley finishes by asking us to choose on of the following items and commit to ourselves to making it happen within the month.

I am going to …
Organise Trainee Feedback
Focused 360 Assessment
Keep a Patient/Teaching Diary
Be Peer Reviewed
Reflect
Develop Team Feedback
Follow up with Patients
Something Else
Nothing I am already Awesome!

What have you committed too?

Direct download: Simon_Carley.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 6:00am AEST

Cliff Reid unites our passion of Critical Care in his SMACC Chicago talk Advice to Young Resuscitationist - It’s up to us to Save the World. Talking us through his advice to his former younger self, Reid sights mistakes, case examples, and essentially provides us with invaluable tips to nudge us along to Resus Mastery.

Reid offers the following advice to his former, younger self;

  • Your career and speciality is a journey and you chose your destination: Don’t be defied by the expectations of one chosen path. Have an appreciation of what other specialities can add and what you can learn from them. Leave your ego at the door.
  • Have a balance of confidence and competence. When something goes wrong you have to change something: Be it either yourself, your colleagues or the system.
  • Follow up on your hypothesis: You won’t know if you got it right or wrong and will not gain or learn from the experience.
  • Preserve comfort and dignity for your patients: 'No one knows how much you know, until they know how much you care' - Greg Henrey.
  • Protect yourselves: Think about the people around you and share your experience with them, chose your colleagues and where you work wisely.
  • Increase team cohesion - it is protective against burnout and compassion fatigue.
  • Be Aware: look after the tools of your trade, your body and mind. Try and maintain good physical health, and train your mind to be more effective under stress.
  • Remember society puts their trust in you - you only fail them when you fail to learn in them.
  • Every patient is a gift/lesson accept it with grace and gratitude.
  • Behave in the way you want to be remembered.
  • Keep perspective and enjoy the ride!

Simon Finfer has spent his career managing patients with traumatic brain injury nad has watched treatment fads come and go. He's also taken part in some of the best and biggest clinical trials in this area which give him a unique perspective on why we do what we do in managing this devastating but common condition. In the contraints of 15 minutes, he'll make you think and hopefully question your own practice!

Direct download: Finfer_on_Controversies_in_TBI.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 5:00am AEST

Imogen Mitchell’s SMACC Chicago talk 'Morphing the Recalcitrant Clinician’ talks us through the steps to engage the reluctant physician when implementing change.

Imogen initally touches on the stages of physician engagement from aversion, to apathy, to engaged and then outlines the steps to morphing the reluctant physician.

1. Seek out a clinical champion
2. Establish a common purpose/vision
3. Standardise what is standardisable
4. Communication, communication, communication
5. Work out barriers and overcome them
6. Deal with the ‘Whats in it for me?’WIFM

Direct download: Imogen_Mitchell.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 6:30am AEST

David Juurlink SMACC Chicago talk 'Drug Interactions That Can Kill (and How to Avoid Them)’ takes us on a journey of drug interactions, case studies, and avoidance strategies.

Juurlink starts by educating us on the two different drug-drug interactions (DDI) - effects of one drug altered by the use of another . First of which is Pharmacokinetic where by one drug alters the level of another, the second Pharmacodynamic being no change in drug levels, and uses this as a basis for his following case studies.

Juurlink speaks of the dreadful literature that is available on the thousands of drug interaction per year, stating that most information comes from case reports and volunteer studies, and suggests that majority of these interaction are avoidable.

Juurlink then goes on to discuss the findings of 4 case studies involving the following Drug-Drug Interactions and their effects on the patients.

SMX/TMP + sulfonylureas
Macrolides + digoxin
APAP + warfarin
SMX/TMP + ACEI/ARB

Juurlink provides us with a short list of trigger drugs that we should be aware of, a list of meds that warrant extra caution and list of possible safer alternatives. He also suggests that it is of the up most importance to have a good pharmacist to turn to as they are given more information on drugs interactions then physicians. And, to utilise resources such as pharmacy times - where you can get information on drug interactions at a push of the button.

Juurlink also suggests that an Informed patient is a very useful safety mechanism.

Direct download: Day_1_C5_David_Juurlink.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 5:00am AEST

Rick Body’s SMACC Chicago talk 'Is compassion a Patients Right?' takes us on a journey of emotions in critical care.

Starting with his rendition of john Lennons ‘Love’. Body, explains the origin of the word compassion - a move to act based on someone else suffering, a sharing of suffering with.

Body, initially focuses on a study conducted within his hospital of 125 patients, who were interviewed when admitted to their emergency department and when they where discharged. From the study it was depicted that, what patients truely wanted was simple human intervention; reassurance, friendliness, explanation, basic care. These responses were then coded into 5 different themes to depict how patients believe their suffering should be addressed;

1. Emotional distress
2. Physical symptoms - including pain (but not restricted to)
3. Information - Included reassurance and explanation
4. Care - Basic care
5. Closure - patients want to put this horrible episode behind them

Body notes that patients are telling us that they want something positive from us. They don’t want us to focus on what we shouldn’t do. They want us to be thinking about what we can do to help… suggesting that if we follow the above ‘EPPIC' we could provide more compassionate care. The problem is this is not compassion as compassion is an emotion and needs to be felt.

Body then explores whats stopping us (care providers) from showing compassion? Sighting the The Good Smaritian Study: that depicts the more in a rush one is the less likely they are to show compassion. The By Standers Affect: if a large crowd is doing nothing, you are more likely to do nothing. Unclear of Who is Responsible: less likely for anyone to respond and Personal Reasons: the responsibility for other peoples lives, fatigue, tough, resilient to showing emotion, emotion been seen as a weakness and a feeling as doctors we are not meant to show emotions.

Body, then shows a picture of a doctor crouched slumped over and inconsolable, shortly after the image was taken the doctor loses a 19 year old patient he was treating and minutes later the he walks back into the emergency room and continues working. This picture went viral on social media and the doctor pictured was seen as admorable. Body sites this example to state that clearing having compassion and showing compassion is right, but is it a right?. And, asks the question 'Would you prefer the surgeon who shaking with emotion as you go into surgery or the surgeon who is composed, objective, calm, tough, resilient, unmovable and efficiently get on with the task in hand?'.

Body believes that patients don’t have a right to compassion as it is an emotion and means to suffer with but asks for health providers to be emotionally intelligent. Explaining that emotional Intelligence recognises that there is a difference between traditional intelligence, IQ and our ability to form effective forms of interpersonal relationships. Siting the 5 domains of emotions intelligence as;
1. Know your emotions - know what we are feeling
2. Manage your emotions - cool rational and object in the rests room, show emotion with patients and family
3. Motivating ones self
4. Recognising emotions in others - empathy
5. Handling Relationships - interpersonal Skills - relate to other people

Body suggest that these are skills that can be developed as ones life goes on and by building skills in emotional intelligence that maybe one can be both a compassionate and effective doctor.

Body concludes by asking the question 'How are you going to care more for your patients?'

Direct download: Rick_Body.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 2:30pm AEST

Andrew Healey takes us on an exploration of the early phases of donor management in ICU and Emergency Medicine in his heart felt SMACC Chicago talk Optimizing the Care of the Organ Donation Patient. Which focuses on the processes of managing donor patients and their families,  while they ride their ICU/ ED journey through to organ donor. 

 
Healey summarises his talk into four main points:
 
1. Set families up to make the right decisions -  be it with end of life care or organ donation.
 
2. Preserve the opportunity for donation - understand that this is often the last decisions a family will have to make about a loved one and they may need time. 
 
3. Never Say No -  never say no to an organ donation, ask the specialist. The only people who can decide if a person is not ideal for organ donation are those people who intimately know the recipient.  Healey sights some interesting stats that are worth thinking about such as;   1 out of every 4 people who are on the heart transplant list in Canada die. While, the risk of contracting HIV or Hepatitis from a transplant heart is 1 in 4000 (HIV) and 1 in 245 (hepatitis). With these in mind the elevated risk donor can look less risky. 
 
4. Remember Organ Donation is never merely a mention - It's up to physicians and critical care providers to guide families to make the right decisions. 
Direct download: Andrew_healey_.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 6:00am AEST

Jeremy Cohen took us on an Adrenal Function journey at SMACC Chicago with his talk Raging Hormones in Critical Care.

Cohen explores the natural roll of cortisol in the human body, various schools of thought and recent research in the areas of sepsis and cortisol resistance.

Direct download: raging_hormones_jeremy_cohan.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 6:30am AEST

Trauma is Risky Business 

Deborah Stein SMACC Chicago talk Trauma is Risky Business - delves into the risk patients and physicians undergo when treating or being treated for Trauma. 

Stein’s speaks of the Risk Benefit Determination that physicians make daily and how this is used to best answer on going questions such as; can a patient have?, how do we care for this patient? and how do we best make all the these decisions?. 

Stein’s suggests a thorough Risk Benefit Determination will include: 
# Analysis of best available data 
# Use of best available judgement 
# Gathering of different opinions 
# An understanding that you won’t always make the right decision 
# To document the 'crap' out of it! 
# And,  to remember you’ll never know what you prevented from not occurring. 

Stein’s also focuses on the risk to patients due to missed injuries, stating that 1.3-39% of injuries in trauma are missed (a majority of which present as orthopaedic cases). And, touching on the processes designed to prevent missed injuries such as; Territory Trauma Survey,  Roles of Clinical Decision Rules,  to scan the living ‘crap’ out of them - whole body CT scans (can decrease mortality but comes attached with its own risks). 

Stein’s then delves into the risks trauma providers (physicians) face on a daily bases. Stating that in the USA trauma providers are one of the highest categories of physicians to be sued, have higher indemnity payment awarded against them and achieve a higher risk score in studies for being sued. While, lawsuits are more likely to increase the chance of physician burnout, career burnout, depression and are emotionally and physically exhausting. Steins sights recent studies that suggest the more open, honest and forthright a physician is with their error with their peers and their hospital, the likelihood of being sued reduces. 

Stein’s also notes that needle stick injuries in most departments have decreased in recent years due to universal precautions, yet have increased in trauma care due to the nature of the ER environment and proper precautions not being taken. Violence is of risk to attending ER nurses, physicians and paramedics, sighting an Australian study that 79% of triage nurses have experienced physical violence from patients. And, the emotional harm the trauma environment can have on trauma providers.

Steins suggests that trauma providers must be aware and learn how to manage risk better to ensure patient and provider safety.

Direct download: trauma_is_risky_business.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 2:00pm AEST

Walter Eppich engages us on the topic of Interprofessional Communication: Challenges and Opportunities. 

 
Eppich describes communication as the engine of learning - providing it is coming from a psychologically 'safe' environment free from humiliation and punishment.
 
Eppich characterises a psychologically safe environment being; an environment where people can speak up with idea, questions and mistakes without being fearful of being wrong and stresses when communication breaks down, patient safety breaks down and learning breakdown.
 
It takes a team to do patient care.
Direct download: Walter_Eppich.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 4:30am AEST